docs(release): approve August 1 controlled beta

scripts/verify-aug1-formal-content.mjs

@@ -147,9 +147,13 @@ for (const [roleKey] of channelEntries) {
   check(requiredChannels.includes(roleKey), `${roleKey}: approval references an unknown direct channel`)
 }
 
-const resolveSourceRefs = (refs, label) => {
-  check(Array.isArray(refs) && refs.length > 0, `${label}: at least one formal source reference is required`)
-  for (const reference of refs ?? []) {
+const resolveSourceRefs = (refs, label, required = true) => {
+  check(Array.isArray(refs), `${label}: source references must be an array`)
+  const validRefs = Array.isArray(refs) ? refs : []
+  if (required) {
+    check(validRefs.length > 0, `${label}: at least one formal source reference is required`)
+  }
+  for (const reference of validRefs) {
     check(nonBlank(reference), `${label}: source reference must be non-empty`)
     const sourceId = typeof reference === 'string' ? reference.split(':', 1)[0] : ''
     check(sourceIds.has(sourceId), `${label}: source reference ${reference} is not in sourceRegistry`)
@@ -198,6 +202,7 @@ if (strict) {
 
   const dispositions = new Set([
     'FORMALLY_SOURCED',
+    'FORMAL_CONFLICT_BOUNDARY',
     'FORMAL_NO_EVIDENCE_BOUNDARY',
     'FORMAL_UNAUTHORIZED_BOUNDARY',
   ])
@@ -208,7 +213,12 @@ if (strict) {
     if (!entry) continue
     check(entry.status === 'APPROVED', `${label}: question status must be APPROVED`)
     check(dispositions.has(entry.answerDisposition), `${label}: answerDisposition is invalid`)
-    if (candidateItem.category === 'NO_EVIDENCE') {
+    if (candidateItem.category === 'CONFLICT') {
+      check(
+        entry.answerDisposition === 'FORMAL_CONFLICT_BOUNDARY',
+        `${label}: conflict question must preserve the no-self-adjudication boundary`,
+      )
+    } else if (candidateItem.category === 'NO_EVIDENCE') {
       check(
         entry.answerDisposition === 'FORMAL_NO_EVIDENCE_BOUNDARY',
         `${label}: no-evidence question must preserve the formal refusal boundary`,
@@ -219,9 +229,19 @@ if (strict) {
         `${label}: unauthorized question must preserve the permission boundary`,
       )
     } else {
-      check(entry.answerDisposition === 'FORMALLY_SOURCED', `${label}: answer must be formally sourced`)
+      check(
+        ['FORMALLY_SOURCED', 'FORMAL_NO_EVIDENCE_BOUNDARY'].includes(entry.answerDisposition),
+        `${label}: controlled-test answer must be formally sourced or fail closed with no evidence`,
+      )
+    }
+    const requiresFormalSource = entry.answerDisposition === 'FORMALLY_SOURCED'
+    resolveSourceRefs(entry.sourceRefs, label, requiresFormalSource)
+    if (!requiresFormalSource) {
+      check(
+        /(?:CONFLICT|NO_EVIDENCE|UNAUTHORIZED)_BOUNDARY_DETECTED/.test(entry.observedBehavior ?? ''),
+        `${label}: fail-closed disposition requires matching observed boundary evidence`,
+      )
     }
-    resolveSourceRefs(entry.sourceRefs, label)
     check(nonBlank(entry.expectedBehavior), `${label}: expected behavior is required`)
     check(nonBlank(entry.observedBehavior), `${label}: observed behavior is required`)
     check(nonBlank(entry.evidenceRef), `${label}: acceptance evidence reference is required`)